![]() |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Another Real-World Lens Test | ||||||||||
The 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS was the first lens that I bought, after the 18-55mm kit lens that came with my Rebel XT. Coming directly from the Canon S1 with its 10X optical zoom, I suppose that it was only natural to want extended reach through the glass. (Also wishing for a bit more clarity than that kit lens, I added the 50mm f/1.8 to the order, and have been extremely pleased with that under-$100 performer.) In relative terms, the 300mm telephoto zoom of this lens is a factor of roughly 8 times over the naked eye, but the Rebel XT (and now EOS 50D), with its crop sensor, delivers the apparent zoom of a 480mm lens. This was what I wanted, but this particular lens proved to be less than spectacular. I have, over the years, rented several of the L series of Canon lenses (two different 70-200 models, a 400 prime, and the 100-400 telephoto zoom), and each successive rental only served to highlight the weaknesses of this 70-300mm. |
||||||||||
| Good reach, but...
Images are somewhat soft from this lens, and can stand a good deal of Photoshop's unsharp mask to make them more acceptable. Results are consistent, if unspectacular. The image stabilization is very good, allowing for longer shutter settings or lower light shooting. The lens protrudes as the zoom is extended. |
||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||
| I would say this - if you, like me, want a "good" telephoto zoom lens and cannot wait until you've saved sufficient pennies for the L glass, then buy this lens. You won't be disappointed, until you have access to the superior line of lenses. But consider - the current street price of this lens is $529.00 (Oct 2010). The entry level 70-200 f/4 L lens is only $120.00 more. If you can live without that extra 100mm reach and image stabilization, but want much better clarity, keep saving. | ||||||||||
| After having owned this lens for several years, I am only now getting around to putting up my Real-World Lens Test page. I promise many, many more photos to come... Here are three photos of my bird feeder, from a distance of about 10 feet — each image links to a 1280 X 800 crop: | ||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
| Carolina Chickadee f/6.3 - 1/400 - ISO200 focal length 250mm |
Tufted Titmouse f/6.3 - 1/400 - ISO200 focal length 250mm |
Tufted Titmouse (2) f/6.3 - 1/400 - ISO200 focal length 250mm |
||||||||
| Here's a typical use for this lens - an osprey perches high atop a tree, a distance of some 100 feet from my position. Click image below for a 1440 X 900 crop, untouched, straight from the camera. | ||||||||||
|
Osprey - EOS 50D - f/18 - 1/80 - ISO400 - focal length 260mm |
||||||||||
| Osprey was back on October 23, 2010 - click thumbs below for 1440 X 900 versions (adjusted for sharpness and color saturation) |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
| Osprey 3696 f/6.3 - 1/250 - ISO200 focal length 240mm |
Osprey 3707 f/6.3 - 1/250 - ISO200 focal length 250mm |
Osprey 3710 f/6.3 - 1/250 - ISO200 focal length 250mm |
||||||||
![]() |
Eagle Sightings
Rarely do I have the right lens at the right moment. An eagle at about 100 feet above the back yard makes we wish I had an L series at hand. Thumbnails link to 1440x900 images. |
![]() |
||||||||
| Eagle 7506 f/5.6 — 1/640 — ISO200 focal length 235mm |
Eagle 7512 f5.6 - 1/640 - ISO200 focal length 235mm |
|||||||||
| Three more unretouched crops, so you can see the results straight from the camera: | ||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
| Cardinal f/5.6 - 1/320 - ISO200 focal length 270mm |
John Deere (full 3MB) f/11 - 1/125 - ISO200 focal length 70mm |
Osprey f/7.1 - 1/500 - ISO200 focal length 300mm |
||||||||
| More bird shots are available on my EOS 50D page | ||||||||||
| Was this page helpful at all? | ...back to Top | |||||||||
| I'd like to hear from my visitors as to whether this sort of amateur lens test is worthwhile. We've all seen what the professional photographers can do, but rarely do the rest of us measure up to that standard. In considering whether or not to throw good money at a lens, I thought it would be interesting to see what the average Joe gets from it. Heck, anybody's results should be as good or better than what I've shown here. Drop me a line and let me know what you think. I plan on several more of these Lens Tests as time goes by... If there's a Canon lens you'd especially like to see, let me know. | ||||||||||
| All images throughout the site are ©tfrog.com Please email for permission to use. |
||||||||||
